Search for: "State v. Light" Results 1081 - 1100 of 29,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Dan Markel
. -- In light of the likely significance of the Court's opinion in Riley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The Supreme Court ordered reconsideration in light of its decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop last year. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:21 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Romola Adeola, Bridging the Accountability Gap in the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons: Non-State Actors Under the Kampala ConventionMariana Clara de Andrade, General Principles of Procedural Law in the Practice of the WTO Appellate Body Marco Longobardo, The Standing of Indirectly Injured States in the Litigation of Community Interests before the ICJ: Lessons Learned and Future Implications in Light of The Gambia v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Considering the issue in light of more recent decisions from both the United States Supreme Court and our sister states, we now conclude that the desire to obtain a driver’s identification following a traffic stop does not constitute an independent, categorical exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:08 am by Thomas Long
” The court vacated and remanded a Board decision finding that three claims of the patent were not obvious in light of prior art (Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Good (07-562), on whether federal law preempts state tort claims against tobacco manufacturers over the marketing of "light" cigarettes. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm by Florian Mueller
The trial structure was threatening to become very complex, and now the focus at the pretrial conference on Tuesday will be on how to proceed with an Epic & Match v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:38 am by Jason Byrne
  This case had been remanded by the Michigan Supreme Court for examination of Confrontation Clause issues in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]