Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Sumption. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
The new Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, gave his first press conference [pdf] on 5 December 2017. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
” Data Privacy and Data Protection The House of Lords will be debating an amendment to the U.K. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Lord Dyson MR, Richards and Black LJJ held that SIAC had no power to impose bail conditions on B because his detention was unlawful. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
(ii) The Strike Out Appeal In Summers v Fairclough Homes [2012] UKSC 26, Lord Clarke held that that the court has power to strike out a statement of claim on the ground that the claim is an abuse of the process of the court at any time. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Briggs. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
In his first interview since becoming Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett has said that judges are being put under “intolerable pressure” by social media users who criticise their decisions. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:19 pm
Lord Advocate and the Non-Refoulement Principle at the Margins Bo-jiun Jing, “Go South” Going South? [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:29 pm
And Judge Chamberlain Haller, who presided over State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Similarly, the European Court of Human Rights has previously refused to accept the UK government’s claim that journalists should receive a higher level of protection under Article 10 (freedom of expression) than non-journalists (Steel and Morris v UK [2005] EMLR 15, [89]). does not mean that popular reactions to criminal activity should receive absolute protection from state interference. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
The Court stated that the issues had to be considered in light of the CJEU ruling which had held that, where a national court examines national legislation in the light of the justification relating to the protection of health under TFEU art 36, it is bound to examine objectively whether it may reasonably be concluded that the means chosen are appropriate and the least restrictive for the attainment of the objectives pursued from the evidence submitted by the Member State… [read post]
