Search for: "Sullivan v. United States" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
The websites that have apparently assisted in the illegal viewing of sports games that were subject to the seizure under Title 18 of the United States Code included channelsurfing.nehq-streams.com, firstrow.net, ilemi.com and rojadirecta.org. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Professor Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy: Disclaimer: views are his own. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am by Justin S. Daniel
” China, home to the world’s largest ivory market, reportedly announced that the country will ban all ivory sales by the end of 2017, a move welcomed by wildlife advocates and which comes after the United States ended its ivory trade in July. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
United States – it suggested that the “hypothetical jury” approach was in fact the correct one. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Senate races in the country: an endangered Democratic incumbent, Mark Begich, against Republican challenger, Dan Sullivan, a former state attorney general and natural resources commissioner. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]