Search for: "US v. Michael Majors" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”Similarly, in his 2005 opinion for the Court in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It is with this backdrop that a recent paper written by Michael Geist and published by the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), The Unintended Equustek Effect: How one case set a precedent for Canadian courts’ growing jurisdiction over internet activities, needs to be critically assessed. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Michael Selmi is surprised, not by the outcome in Epic Systems v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
Over at the Legal Pulse, Michael Kiklis (an Akin Gump associate) comments on Bilski v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
   Blogger Michael Cohen reports on one case in which she did, in fact, rule in favor of a copyright holder. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
Burwell and the Chevron At casetext, Michael Foreman describes the Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In thus borrowing a tactic made infamous by enslavers and segregationists, the Missouri legislators who voted for SAPA may have awoken a majority of the Supreme Court to their duty to defend the supremacy of federal law against the would-be heirs to an ignoble insurrectionist tradition.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]