Search for: "United States v. Green" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In it, he states: Now, let’s move right onto our next legal target and source of lots of billable hours. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 12:36 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
No, same-sex marriages are not recognized by immigration law for the purpose of immigrating to the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
As attorneys licensed to practice law in Oregon, we took an oath to "support the Constitution and the laws of the United States and of the State of Oregon. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:30 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Gordon immigrated from Jamaica to the United States as a green card holder in 1982 when he was six years old, and he's lived here ever since. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm by Margaret Wood
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
Instead, trial courts say that the United States Supreme Court has said that the death penalty is not unconstitutional as being cruel or unusual. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeIn Rejecting Conviction, Appeals Panel Rules on Need For Intent to Defraud Under 18 USC §505 Forgery United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
”  One such paper – Deconstructing the Myth of Careful Study: A Primer on the Flawed Progression of the Child Pornography Guidelines (January 1, 2009) by Troy Stabenow – is the likely impetus behind a notable decision from the Second Circuit issued yesterday: United States v. [read post]