Search for: "A Thomas"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 66,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
Cataldo) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark COMMERCEPAY for "Providing working capital financing to small businesses and small business owners; Accounts receivables financing; financing services" in view of the registered mark COMMERCEPAYMENTS for, inter alia, "banking services" and various financial services.]In re Soil Basics Corporation, Serial No. 97183502 (June 18, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:39 am
Concerning the Act, Dr Thomas Buchholz, Digital Technologies, BSH Hausgeräte made the interesting point that for inventors, the obligation in the Act to provide “explainable AI” will make it critical to file a patent application before product launch. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
Thomas, or St. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm
As much as I do not want Justice Clarence Thomas on the Court, I very much welcome his majority opinion on this bump stock matter, in Garland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm
Despite these bizarre beliefs, Thomas De Quincey, who wrote a wonderful essay about him, said that his political views ‘seemed to Mr Wordsworth and myself every way worthy of a philosopher.'"From Radical Wordsworth: The Poet Who Changed the World (commission earned). [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:55 pm
“Justice Clarence Thomas casts cloud over lawsuits challenging diversity programs”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Reuters has a post that begins, “U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:14 am
Against the backdrop of the dictionary definitions and third-party uses of FUCK SHIT UP shown and discussed below, even when Applicant's proposed mark is presented in block letters as FUCKSHITUP, it is far more likely that consumers of clothing will view and understand the proposed mark as a compound word consisting of the three familiar words FUCK, SHIT, and UP than as any of the gobbledygook that Applicant claims purchasers may see instead Judge Thomas Wellington dissented, reasoning… [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
She indirectly challenged Justice Clarence Thomas’s view of history and his originalism in a voting rights case this term. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
This post is based on a working paper by Professor Bens, Gavin Cassar, Ying Huang, and Thomas Keusch. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
This post is based on a working paper by Professor Bens, Gavin Cassar, Ying Huang, and Thomas Keusch. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:37 am
He studied law at the University Thomas Sankara in Burkina Faso (LL.B. and LL.M.) and also holds an LL.M. in International and comparative law from University of Lausanne. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
The lowest ratings in this regard were Clarence Thomas (unfavorable rating of 33%); Brett Kavanaugh (unfavorable rating of 30%); and Amy Coney-Barrett (unfavorable rating of 24%). [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:04 am
Gillian Thomas, Final "Pregnant Workers Fairness Act" Regulations Were Released -- and its Great News for Women, Ms. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
"Of course, the folks most interested in making coercion a necessary element of a successful establishment clause case are the ones who prided themselves on being textualists (Scalia, Rehnquist, and Thomas). [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
The post 211 | Client Rewind: How Alex Paid Off $20,000 and Saved $30,000 appeared first on Rho Thomas. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court Backs the CFPB In a 7–2 decision written by Justice Thomas, the Supreme Court upheld the CFPB’s funding structure. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm
However, it was pointed out by Thomas Dreiser (Huawei) that transparency goes in both directions. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
By May, Justice Thomas still had not mustered the five votes needed. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:13 am
Informal expressions of interest may be directed to the co-chair of the Faculty Selection Committee, Professor Thomas Gallanis, at tgallani@gmu.edu. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:May 30, 2024 CV-23-1429 [*1]In the Matter of David Strzepek, Petitioner, v Thomas P. [read post]