Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open justice, to… [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am
’ Juror A received three responses, one of which stated: `Throw the book at 'em. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:34 pm
What we do know is that 8 years following the CCH v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
It deals with the application of the rule set down 50 years ago in White and Carter (Councils) Limited v McGregor [1962] AC 413 which states that where a party repudiates a contract, the innocent party has the option to either sue for damages or refuse to accept the repudiation and keep the contract alive. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
In the first part of this series of articles we introduced the current state-of-play between Apple and its Android rivals, particularly Samsung. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
The unusual situation of a judge in a civil case deciding whether a party is guilty of murder has arisen before: in Halford v Brookes ([1992] P.I.Q.R. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
ACE USA (067640) 3. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm
” Azer v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
AC has not agreed to withdraw its tariff application. [read post]
Shoulda Woulda? Alberta Court of Appeal Considers the Mental Element of the Tort of Civil Conspiracy
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am
Berryland Book, where it said: “The leading authority on intention and knowledge in this context is OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:30 pm
He subsequently admitted to throwing his daughter on the car seat “[f]ace first” two times.From the decision, State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:18 pm
But after oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:03 am
The US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi) on April 2, 2012, announced its decision in ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]