Search for: "Action Express LLC" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 (2014), the California Supreme Court held that any waiver of an employee’s right to pursue PAGA claims, either at all or in court, violates California public policy and is unenforceable under California law. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 9:04 pm by Joe Whitworth
Food and Drug Administration confirmed the parasite in salad from the Chiquita Brands LLC subsidiary Fresh Express. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The Gordons are not bringing a cause of action based on Kuzara's conduct pursuant to the [operating agreement]. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:46 pm by Intellectual Property Group
Her complaint included causes of action, including: (1) inducement of copyright infringement; (2) contributory copyright infringement; and (3) vicarious copyright infringement. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Nessim is co-founder and CEO, and Stephen Sigrist is a senior vice president, at SAR LLC. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by John Hopkins
“The FTC brings this action…to obtain permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for the acts or practices of Defendants’ Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Prevagen, Inc., Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Mark Underwood, and Michael Beaman (collectively, “Defendants”)…in… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by John Hopkins
“The FTC brings this action…to obtain permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for the acts or practices of Defendants’ Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc., Quincy Bioscience, LLC, Prevagen, Inc., Quincy Bioscience Manufacturing, LLC, Mark Underwood, and Michael Beaman (collectively, “Defendants”)…in… [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, applying the rationale expressed by the Ohio Supreme Court in [other, non-defamation cases], we hereby hold that the discovery rule applies to those libel actions where the publication of the defamatory statements was secretive, concealed, or otherwise inherently unknowable due to the nature of the publication. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
According to the amended complaint, Spadaccini was retained to represent the interests of the members of Macabagi, LLC ("LLC") in purchasing the property; Spadaccini advised Battaglia that the property was to be purchased by Battaglia, Bartolomeo Piraino Massimo Grillo and Calogero Drago for approximately $275 000; Spadaccini would close the transaction with each of the four members having a 25% percent interest in the LLC (Spadaccini had drawn up the operating… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 101 without express recitation of the medium? [read post]