Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:52 pm
However, do not compete on price but on value. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Government (TorrentFreak) A new record: 9,729 P2P porn pushers sued at once (ArsTechnica) US Copyright – Decisions Thomas-Rasset damage award: The strange, unpredictable world of copyright damages (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (Recording Industry vs People) (Recording Industry vs People) District Court E D California orders company to stop sending bogus DMCA notices to eBay: Design Furnishings, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:02 am
For example, in Intel Corp v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Here's another hurdle to jump, although it's certainly jumpable.Hawes v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
* NY Times: Nutsonline.com switched to Nuts.com at a very high price, yet traffic and sales plummet for months [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
Their purported companies are likely to appear well-established, reputable, and qualified to do the tasks at hand. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
Case citation: Perkins v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
On the plaintiff's end, the owners of the underlying copyrights in the musical compositions are not involved in the case; neither are many smaller record companies. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In Horne v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:43 pm
Among other things, the complaint also alleges that following the news of the lawsuit, the holding company’s share price declined 30%. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The new law was welcomed by publishers but condemned by internet companies. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
"A cap on app store commissions would be infinitely more helpful than the sham settlement proposed in the Northern Distict of California, where the attorneys-general of 36 U.S. states, Epic Games, and Match Group (to whose complaint Google responded this week) are still pushing for a meaningful result. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:01 am
Tobinick v. [read post]
