Search for: "Change v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 50,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 2:07 pm by Brett Trout
” In reaching this conclusion, the Copyright Office relies on the case of Naruto v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am by Brian Clark
United States, 432 F.2d 1052, 1055 (3d Cir. 1970) [17] The Stalker Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Pozen argues it is not too late to change course, and I agree. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There is no interpretation of "post-acceptance" or "retroactive" that fits a law passed in 2010 that gives states notice that the requirements for eligibility would change FOUR years later, and no additional money from the states would be needed for several years after that. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
And I illustrate this logic at work in United States v. [read post]