Search for: "Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 4,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2018, 9:38 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Gaylor v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
The Commonwealth appealed. [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a trial court’s finding that a servicer did not violate the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) because the borrower could not prove that the servicer’s failure to respond to a “Qualified Written Request” (QWR) caused her actual damages, as required by 12 Read more → Ernest Wagner [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a trial court’s finding that a servicer did not violate the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) because the borrower could not prove that the servicer’s failure to respond to a “Qualified Written Request” (QWR) caused her actual damages, as required by 12 Read more → Ernest Wagner [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:02 am
Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals helped block the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:11 am
Finally, based on 2nd Circuit case law the Court dismisses the case entirely based on a lack of plausible allegations of an intent to return. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:56 am
Subsequently, two months later the parties have reached the settlement and filed a motion to dismiss the case but the motion was denied by the court.The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the monkey, which was named as the plaintiff, lacked statutory standing to bring an action for copyright action under the Copyright Act. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:20 am
The case has been appealed to the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 5:45 am
That citation has direct implications in the University of Minnesota’s appeal to the Federal Circuit of PTAB’s ruling (wrong in my view and others) in the Ericsson decision that state institutions (such as state universities) waive their 11th Amendment sovereign immunity in IPRs if they have brought a separate patent infringement suit in federal district court. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred when it affirmed the exclusion of the petitioner’s expert rebuttal testimony regarding his future dangerousness in violation of Kelly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
§ 4B1.2’s elements clause; and (2) whether published orders issued by a circuit court of appeals under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:45 am
The 7th Circuit rejected the analysis of the 4th Circuit in Lubrisol setting up a clear circuit split. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:43 am
Andrew Bryant & Jennifer Danish On April 4, 2018, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion vacating the denial of a Supplemental Security Income disability claim brought by 47-year-old Rebecca Ann Akin, who suffered from fibromyalgia, back and neck pain, and headaches. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 5:13 am
Will IPR cases already on appeal be remanded, en mass, by the Federal Circuit back to the Board to effectively rework each Final Written Decision? [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 10:39 am
After determining the 7th Circuit had jurisdiction, the court agreed with the insurer. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:36 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit at this link. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that the minor child of a credit card account holder was not bound by the arbitration clause in the cardholder agreement because she did not become an authorized user of the account by using the credit card. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:05 pm
Moreover, the ruling contradicts an interpretation of the EPA reaffirmed by the 7th Circuit Court as recently as November 2017. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
Georgia Regional Hospital, 850 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2017), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a lesbian employee who claimed she was discharged because of her sexual orientation did not have an actionable claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
