Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There was, however, no cross-examination of the Secretary of State’s key witness. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:37 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under... [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:59 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement is not hearsay if...The declarant testifies at trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is... [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Kathy Joan Copas v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Morris v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 9:25 am
The situation is similar in other border states. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:27 am
The admissibility of breathalyzer evidence in Massachusetts DUI cases may depend upon how the courts apply the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (Sutton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
Jordan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Weaving v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm
” The Third Circuit turned that argument around on the government recently, in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 11:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:03 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 2:14 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
In Davis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:39 am
Wickard v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 2:29 pm
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
