Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 28,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 8:51 am
In an opinion by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court held that (1) North Carolina's victory in a similar state-court lawsuit does not dictate the disposition of this case or alter the applicable standard of review; (2) the district court did not err in concluding that race furnished the predominant rationale for District 1's redesign and that the state's interest in complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 could not justify that consideration of race; and… [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
[See WIMS 1/16/13]. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Among the many things that may be gleaned from the judgment of nearly 200 paragraphs (and remember, the copyright infringement and invalidity-via-bad-faith counterclaims are still to come), this Kat notes the following:* it could not be argued that the use of a picture of Betty Boop on the products is within section 11(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 or Article 12(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
. ----, 2012 WL 43514 (1/10/12) the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) considered whether the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:26 pm
For Regulation A, the relief applies to post-qualification amendments required at least every 12 months after the qualification date to include updated financial statements, annual reports on Form 1-K, semi-annual reports on Form 1-SA, special financial reports on Forms 1-K or 1-SA, current reports on Form 1-U, and exit reports on Form 1-Z. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm
When starting from D3, this failed to disclose features 1.3 and 1.4 of claim 1 and features 9.4 to 9.6 of claim 9. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
Her argument was based on s.20(1) Limitation Act 1980. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am
What outstanding seventeen-year-old would turn down a guaranteed $1 million to play at, say, Georgia or Texas, in favor of an otherwise desirable spot at Kansas State or Purdue? [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Femedeer[1] v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It does not criticize this part of the decision. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:35 am
Does your company use a Rule 10b5-1 plan for corporate buybacks: - Yes - 58.1% - No - 41.9% 2. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 am
How does this work? [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:14 pm
The post Truck Company Auto Insurance Policy Limits: How Does This Affect Me? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
NLRB Law Memo 05/12/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 11:35 am
If the employer does not offer employer flex credits, then the health FSA does not need to be reported. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 5:36 am
No. 5, 03/1/2017Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:34 am
[UPDATE at 12:30 pm BST: the text of the Opinion is now available here] [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
See Oral Arg. at 11:44–12:11, http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx? [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm
Currently, 32 hits are displayed in the search results (although that does include a couple of corrigenda!). [read post]
