Search for: "David B Long"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
They have now been given life-long anonymity. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Posted by Elisse B. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 1:29 pm
That is, as long as it’s not the only thing on your mind. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 1:29 pm
That is, as long as it’s not the only thing on your mind. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Tatel and David B. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
B. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Reid, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, November 21, 2016 Tags: Alternative entities, Asset management, Brexit, EU, Europe, Financial regulation, Fund managers, International governance, Private equity, Private funds, UK Thoughts for Directors Posted by Steven B. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
There are a couple of different viewpoints on this.In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Jason Furman and Alan B. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am
’ The presumption of innocence reflects a long-standing societal judgment that ‘in the eyes of the law every man is honest and innocent unless it be proved legally to the contrary’. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Long © term is the source of the problem. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am
Cavers; David N. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:18 am
Circuit Chief Judge Merrick B. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am
For that reason, the Lead Underwriters did not fall within the ambit of Section 16(b). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
David G. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:09 am
For example, as my colleague David Garland’s book regarding the death penalty points out, in many way the U.S. looked a lot more like Western Europe 50 years ago than it does today, and we have diverged in multiple dimensions, partly because our polit [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
On 3 November 2016, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the libel damages assessment of Undre v London Borough of Harrow ([2016] EWHC 2761 (QB)). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
To the extent “intermediate scrutiny” has teeth — and I’m generally skeptical of this point — it comes in part (b): Has the government demonstrated that these disclosure provisions do not “burden substantially more speech than necessary” to advance that interest? [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
N.C.) lays them out well; see also David Post’s blog post on the case, published after the North Carolina decision came down. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
But despite this specter, New York’s highest court just adopted the doctrine of de facto parentage, in Brooke B. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
§ 1400(b). [read post]
