Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Stephens 15-187Issue: (1) Whether a federal court of appeals is authorized to review sua sponte and invalidate an order reopening the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6), when the appellee never appealed the order; (2) whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
The United States also has a concept of double patenting to avoid multiple patents on the same invention. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States, 15-5756, is a spin-off of last Term’s Johnson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:31 am
Board of Education of Township High School District 205, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), and United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
Thus, the preclusion of the affidavits does not render inadequate plaintiffs' opposition to the dismissal motions. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
United States, 14-10154, probably returns for a second time. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
On December 4, 2007, the mortgage was filed in the office of the Franklin County Recorder, without the notary acknowledgement. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm
United States 14-10154Issue: (1) Whether a misdemeanor crime with the mens rea of recklessness qualifies as a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
The court set trial for March 4, 2013. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Attorney Gen. of the United States, 277 F.3d 1305, 1308 n.2 (2002), the 11th Circuit held that a stand-alone detainer does not put an individual in custody of ICE. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 3:26 am
The victim then called #9-1-1 reported the defendant. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1(i) through (v). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1(i) through (v). [read post]
