Search for: "English v. English" Results 1101 - 1120 of 9,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
 The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Introduction In a ruling by Hacon HHJ on 4 July 2022, [here] the English Patents Court has invalidated three patents belonging to J. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:07 am by tracey
Emerson Electric Co and others v Morgan Crucible Co plc and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 1559;   [2012] WLR (D)  354 “The fact that a European parent company had been found guilty of infringing European competition law did not give the Competition Appeal Tribunal jurisdiction to hear a follow-on claim for damages brought under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998 against an English subsidiary which had not been an addressee to the European Commission’s… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 7:54 am by Vivian Robinson
The recent judgment in the case of Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd [2017] EWHC 1017 (QB) is a matter of major concern for companies and those involved in advising them on the best approach to the prospect of investigation by the U.K. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:50 pm
In Allianz Insurance Co Egypt v Aigaion Insurance Co SA [2008] EWHC 1127 (Comm), the English High Court was asked to examine the effect of the term "Deffered [sic] Premium Clause" in the reinsurance slip and to ascertain whether its inclusion was so uncertain as to be of no contractual effect and to make the whole contract ineffective.Allianz alleged that Aigaion had agreed to reinsure 30 percent of the cover provided by Allianz in respect of a fleet of tugs. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:34 am by Matthew Nied
In a recent decision of the English High Court in Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v DesignTechnica Corporation ["Metropolitan International"] (see: case), Justice Eady held that Google, the popular search engine, was not liable for defamatory material that appeared in its search results. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:52 am by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has granted the artist in the “banned memoir” case, OPO v MLA, permission to appeal and ordered an expedited hearing. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
At the heart of the judgment is a reaffirmation of the fundamental principle of English statutory interpretation – that ordinary English words contained in statute should be given their ordinary English meaning. [read post]