Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 66,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm by Shaheen Rahman
Resounding defeat All these grounds failed before Mr. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
 See Board of Trustees of State University of N.Y. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Wells Bennett
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:20 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court is not taking the appeal of Edwin Hardeman v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 5:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The opinion is a 2020, opinion from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, and is styled, Kimberly Holick v. [read post]