Search for: "Fisher v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
He has just begun appealing his conviction and sentence.The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
Elin Fisher, Simon D. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
” Fisher, 794 F.2d at 432 (quoting Harper & Row, 105 S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Fisher and another, heard 19th-20th July 2023. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
In 1970, the United States filed United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:03 am
Matter of Gaines v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
Fisher. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Thomas Fisher argues for the state of Indiana. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:22 am
In The New York Times, Manny Fernandez reports on oral arguments in the Fifth Circuit in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Maryland 1979); their bank records (Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
______________________________Argued April 27, 2021 – Decided June 15, 2021Before Judges Fisher, Gilson and Gummer.On appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, Docket No. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
In Holt v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
Fisher said. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Fisher v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
. to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
