Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2007, 2:05 pm
Mencken -- "the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy") in Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Association v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by Ted Frank
Reuters unquestioningly accepts the claim of Joseph Sellers of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll that the firm "is in the hole by about $7 million" for its role to date on the Dukes v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:17 pm
"This letter tells marketers like Procter & Gamble that their 'sponsored consumers' must disclose that they are shilling, or they are probably in violation of the prohibition against deceptive advertising. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
Discussion of the Gambling Act 2005 was notably absent from the judgment, which is strange since the promotions would seem to fall within its remit, although the enforcer of that legislation is the Gambling Commission and not the OFT".Both Carlton and the IPKat are curious to know what readers think. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
But it's not just a few bucks in gambling money at stake for the winner. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:17 am by Michael Risch
Consider, for example, commercial v. residential strength detergents. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
  At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard looks at Murphy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:55 am by Paul D. Swanson
Cal. 2009) could be applied in any number of cases: “[The defendant] gambled by proposing a condensed interrogatory on obviousness. [read post]