Search for: "Grant v. District of Columbia"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Fifty years ago today, Chief Justice Warren delivered the unanimous decision of the court; within that decision was this statement: In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia (as well as the Comptroller General) understood the scope of the Part 600 regulations in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 3rd, 5th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits, that ambiguity required for granting Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
She was therefore granted summary judgment. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:33 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia, characterized the Warren court as “absolutely path-breaking in terms of its expansion of rights, although subsequent courts have narrowed the scope of the ruling. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Faced with the male Justices’ insensitivities during oral argument in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:26 am
On April 19, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled, upholding the Department of Home Security’s 2016 STEM OPT Rule Program in a detailed opinion. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
It is geared towards the District of Columbia rules. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:08 am
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this preview ran on August 8, 2016, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 10th and District of Columbia Circuits, the answer is “no. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:24 am
In Little v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Accordingly,in this case, we reversed the district court’s judgmentwith respect to the ’727 patent and dismissed Medicines’cross-appeal regarding the ’343 patent as moot.The full court subsequently granted Medicines’ petitionfor rehearing en banc in Hospira, and on rehearingheld that Medicines’ relationship with BVL did not giverise to an invalidating “commercial offer for sale” underPfaff v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
The second new grant is in Ayestas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia applied the Lone Steer standard to an OFCCP compliance evaluation dispute in its November 2011 decision in United Space Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
