Search for: "Holder v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 7,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
” (citing Galef v Alexander and Edgar v MITE Corp, respectively, p.15) And so, as agreed by the parties, Dutch law would apply to this action. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
It now appears as though the much-anticipated case al-Marri v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:38 am
City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
These three paragraphs state cumulative conditions. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm
United States, Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Even in the most important non-EU European jurisdiction, the UK, SEP holders get far greater leverage than in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
In Summerhill Village Homeowners Association v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted cert. in Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Grosshart v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2016 WL 5661526 (W.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
In Flynn v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This reasoning walks a fine line without providing any certainty for trade mark holders and future applicants as to where the protection of a word or concept begins and where it ends. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
"After rejecting the State's arguments, Judge Debevoise suggested that the State reconcile the Truth in Music Act with the Lanham Act by interpreting subsection (e) of the former to permit unregistered trademark holders to perform under their group names without any additional requirements. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
The key question was whether the "lawfully made under this title" language of the first sale section refers to items that were physically made in the United States or whether it encompasses copies that were licensed by a United States copyright holder but manufactured abroad. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In 2006, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Scotch Whisky Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:43 pm
Fund 3, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:45 am
Co-author Brittany Blakey The takeaway from Hahn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
