Search for: "IN RE HOWARD" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Howard Matz, Senior United States District Judge, Central District of California What lawyers should do to make disputes more meaningful to the judge. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:17 pm by Paul Horwitz
--a comment on Howard's post below has set me off. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  If Maynard was a football game, the final score would be 5-2, the field would be muddy, both quarterbacks would leave the game with concussions, and the cheerleaders would all look like Clint Howard. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
— Andrew Larratt-Smith (UC Riverside), Judy Bruner (UC San Diego)"Helping Visitors Put ‘First Things First’" — Elisa Enriquez (Los Alamos National Laboratory)"Lessons Learned from Evaluating an Ombuds-lite Program at the World Bank Group" — Thomas Zgambo (World Bank Group), Odile Rheaume (World Bank Group)"Now That We’re Here, How Far Do We Go?" [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
Howard Koh during a media session with reporters including those from MedPage Today.com. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
(holding that plaintiffs had failed to prove that their cancers were caused by radiation exposures, on the basis of their statistical, epidemiological proofs), aff’d, 339 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1964) (per curiam) In re King, 352 Mass. 488, 491-92, 225 N.E.2d 900, 902 (1967) (physician expert’s opinion that expressed a mathematical likelihood, unsupported by clinical evidence, that claimant’s death from cancer was caused by his accidental fall was legally insufficient to… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Michael Kirkland of UPI notes that Congress re-enacted the FISA Amendments Act in late December, giving the Court a “living controversy to chew on. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Sklar Race to the Bottom re: The Auditors by Francie Mckenna SEC Actions by Thomas O. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Sklar Race to the Bottom re: The Auditors by Francie Mckenna SEC Actions by Thomas O. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Sklar Race to the Bottom re: The Auditors by Francie Mckenna SEC Actions by Thomas O. [read post]