Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
Sullivan, J., dissents with separate opinion: I respectfully dissent. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
In anticipation of [name withheld]'s trial, three psychological experts examined [name withheld] and all concluded that he no longer posed a threat to likely re-offend, prosecutors said. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 3:56 pm
We're guessing that most of you belong to the "transparency is good" school of thought. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Ed. note: This post is by Will Meyerhofer, a former Sullivan & Cromwell attorney turned psychotherapist. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:31 am
Andrew Sullivan detects a lie. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:30 am
Sullivan at the Drug and Device Law blog). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:53 am
Cravath’s bonuses are a little bit more generous than the spring bonuses previously announced by Sullivan & Cromwell.Weil was trying to figure out which firm, Cravath or S&C, the market would follow. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 1:46 am
We're being offered a lot of money for this shit. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:43 pm
Still, we're better off now than we were with the typewriter and print indexes to periodicals. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:15 am
Waxman’s new client, the former CEO of reinsurer General Re, Ron Ferguson, and four other defendants haven’t been sentenced yet, so the 2nd Circuit briefs won’t be filed until well into 2009. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
Sullivan, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:24 am
Fox resigned as House speaker the next day and said he would not seek re-election, but he did not directly address the probe. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 7:31 am
Dave said, “You’re welcome back anytime. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
We’re referring to Dennis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:20 pm
We're down to eight firms in our 2009 March Madness for Law Firms. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Most of us think of “living paycheck to paycheck” as a condition afflicting the poor and low paid, but we’re wrong. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:39 am
Sullivan remains to be seen. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:26 pm
But if you’re not familiar with Vidal, Amnesia provides a concise and enjoyable introduction. [read post]
