Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 5,932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
Of course the first amendment applies to new forms of speech and expression, just as evolved methods of torture implicate the eighth amendment and electronic surveillance triggers the fourth amendment. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
But where the Fourth Amendment provides a foundation of sorts, Article 11 builds a whole house above it. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
Previously announced amendments to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s exempt offering rules went into effect on March 15, 2021. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
This conduct violates Rule 17a-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), which requires certain exchange members, brokers, and dealers to preserve all business records for three years. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:34 am
But not this one.Plaintiff pleads a plausible claim because (1) government misconduct is almost always a matter of public concern and (2), on the Garcetti issue, while plaintiff learned about the cover-up through his usual job duties, "this case involves the refusal to file a false report, which is different than simply filing a report. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
City Square 10, 27 (2013). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Cortesluna, 20-1539Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 808 F.2d 1471, 1483-84, 1 USPQ2d 1241, 1249 (Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm
The post Will the court recognize New York’s “door opening” rule as an exception to the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
Tuesday, October 5, 2021, at 1:00 p.m.: The House Foreign Affairs will hold a hearing evaluating the withdrawal from Afghanistan and U.S. policies. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Slides here.Begin with legislative action: Trademark Modernization Act, Which introduces three of the big themes of the year: (1) trademark use, (2) the harm of infringement, and (3) the role of the First Amendment in limiting the scope of trademark rights. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
Weinstein, “Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is Sound; It Should Not Be Amended,” 138 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
You matter. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 5:32 pm
MTCC 1168 suggests that there may not be much sympathy for the comfort of counsel in evading virtual options, interpreting the new Rule 1.08 of the Rules of Civil Procedure in the first reported decision since the amendment on Jan. 1, 2021, adding video conference. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:32 am
Duties include: (1) Assisting with legal research and writing; (2) Litigation in various jurisdictions; (3) Conducting Tribal economic development projects; (4) Drafting/reviewing corporate bylaws, resolutions and ordinances; (5) Researching and drafting policies and procedures for various Tribal governmental departments; and (6) Researching and drafting research memos on tax issues, jurisdictional questions, and other matters that focus on representation of Indian tribes and… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
Gore, there is the matter of Article II, Section 1, which gives Congress the power to "determine the time of choosing the electors . . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
It would not matter if the profits/loss allocation was 60-20-20, each member’s vote would count equally. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 6:01 am
The appellate panel noted that FRCP 60(b)(4) contemplates two scenarios in which relief may be granted: (1) a jurisdictional error; and (2) a failure of due process because the movant was not given notice or an opportunity to be heard.With respect to the jurisdictional component of the rule, the panel said the district court in Romeril’s case did have both subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm
See Ultimately, the court held "that even though Section 230 immunity does not apply, the claim was properly dismissed as a matter of [Florida] trademark law" "because of the serious First Amendment issues that would be raised by allowing [Plaintiff's] claim. [read post]
