Search for: "In the Matter of Sanders" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
The matter is now before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm by David Lat
To be honest, though, even though this complaint is nicely drafted — clear, concise, and matter-of-fact — it’s not that juicy a read. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm by George Lenard
By Beth Hanson, with George Lenard In Part I last week, we introduced and explained the Supreme Court’s February 28 “cat’s paw” ruling in favor of the plaintiff in Staub v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 am by Ken Lopez
 This patent infringement matter was tried over seven trial days in January in the Eastern District of Texas using litigation graphics and litigation consulting from Animators at Law. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/837171.opn.pdf In his dissent, Justice Sanders noted that precedent dictates that opinion testimony regarding a defendant’s veracity is unfairly prejudicial to the defendant because it invades the exclusive province of the jury. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:27 am by Schachtman
  Another epidemiologist, who wrote the chapter in the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, on epidemiology, put the matter thus: “Epidemiology answers questions about groups, whereas the court often requires information about individuals. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:10 am by law shucks
As a matter of professional courtesy (or pure dollars and cents, depending on your level of cynicism), a number of firms that were failing were bailed out by other firms who picked up many or most of the lawyers. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
The truth matters because U.S. trade and economic policies—your pocketbook—hang in the balance.Indeed. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Schultz: In a plurality opinion authored by Justice Chambers and joined by Justices Sanders, Stephens, James Johnson and Charles Johnson, the Court overturned Ms. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm by Michael Markarian
The 111th Congress turned out to be a very productive session that ushered in several major policy reforms for animal welfare that were top priorities for HSUS and HSLF. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by FDABlog HPM
  Late in 2010, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) even said that the BPCIA’s 12-year exclusivity provisions create an ethical “defect” and should be changed. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.opn.pdf In her dissent, Justice Stephens, joined by Justice Sanders, argued that the case should have been remanded to a superior court for a reference hearing to resolve unanswered factual questions, and pointed out that the majority mischaracterized Mr. [read post]