Search for: "Jacks v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2007, 1:18 am
Second, I criticize the new myth claim (advanced by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith, and Sosa v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
These allegations, which must be accepted as true on a motion to dismiss (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87), are sufficient to state a cause of action (see NWE Corp v Atomic Risk Management, 25 AD3d 349 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm by Maxine Neuhauser
In a brief  opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am by Victoria Clark
  Steve Slick reviewed Loch Johnson’s book “Spy Watching: Intelligence Accountability in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:40 am by Andrew Trask
Starcher analyzes the benefits and costs of each of these approaches, and then argues for a newer approach, one first taken in an unpublished 2012 district court case, Mey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am by Stewart Baker
But the Illinois state courts, unburdened by federal standing law, may yet give teeth to this seriously dumb law as Rosenbach v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:04 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jeffrey Kahn presented his observations from oral arguments in Georgia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
Rather, he placed the blame on his predicament on "that girl" - V. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 5:16 am by Victoria Clark
The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 8:52 am by Christiana Wayne
Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes described the history of Lawfare and its connection to the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:36 am
" (NYT).The oral argument is today.If you're trying to remember why this is still a live issue after the wedding-cake case:The court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop on an idiosyncratic ground that is not at issue in the new case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:32 pm by CAFE
Code § 19 Presidential Succession Act of 1792 Presidential Succession Act of 1886 Congressional Research Service report on presidential succession, 6/29/05 Continuity of Government Commission succession report, 6/1/09 Jack Goldsmith, “A Presidential Succession Nightmare,” Lawfare, 3/25/20 BARR & RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Free Exercise Clause of the 1st Amendment  AG Barr’s Fox News interview with Laura Ingraham, 4/8/20 DOJ spokesperson tweeting… [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am by Alex R. McQuade
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]