Search for: "John B. O"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Chanbonpin ProfChanbonpin John Marshall (Chicago) Anupam Chander AnupamChander UC Davis Guy-Uriel Charles ProfGuyCharles Duke Mary Cheh marycheh George Washington Jim Chen chenx064 Michigan State Miriam Cherry Prof_MCherry St. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
Officer Bolin detained [Black] and John Feagley while the other officers went to the apartment. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et al, 2000) •… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 11:00 am
Esta idea del Estado como garante de libertades individuales no sólo ha tenido resonancia normativa en muchas constituciones estatales, sino en el influyente neocontractualismo desarrollado por trabajos como los de John Rawls durante el siglo pasado. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
O’Brien, No. 08-1569 (5/24/2010) Whether or not a given firearm is a machine gun is an element of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
” The Committee members heard from John S. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Knox, John H. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
John R. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
§ 42.100(b). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
Pickens III – sued his son Michael O. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Star Wars producer Lucasfilm fails to win damages over unauthorised replicas of stormtrooper helmets - EWCA decision in Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Trademark Blog) (Class 99) USPTO releases patent pendency simulation tool - Patent Pendency Model (PPM)… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
In a recently published article in ProMarket, John Kwoka of Northeastern University (who “worked on the draft Merger Guidelines while serving at the Federal Trade Commission as chief economist to the chair in 2022”) asserts that the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:53 am
Derechos y obligaciones de los abuelos: derecho puertorriqueño. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:53 am
Derechos y obligaciones de los abuelos: derecho puertorriqueño. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 pm
[and] [t]o be guilty of a violation of §36(b) . . . the adviser-manager must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm’s-length bargaining. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:21 pm
" When I cover the plain view doctrine in class, I use this example to illustrate how it works: Officers are executing a warrant to search John Doe's home for stolen TV sets. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
That conjunction suggests that clauses [c] and [d] both modify clause [b]. [read post]
