Search for: "John T. Minor, V"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 3:36 pm
The name is Harris v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts asked Hearne how confident he actually was that the over- and under-populated districts weren’t necessary to comply with the VRA and obtain preclearance. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
From Friday's decision in Amor v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
But don't take my word for it. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
(Canada) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Our only disagreement is whether one could do this via a cleverly designed legislative statute--I am in the minority that thinks this possible--or whether it would in fact be necessary to run the quite likely fatal hurdles set up by Article V to eliminate life tenure. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
Senator Edward Kennedy and Representative John Conyers, Jr. are the sponsors of these separate bills. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
” (xiv) The “intellectual lodestar” (xxxii) of the libertarian movement is John C. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The focus on minority language rights and s. 15 of the Charter indicates that the aim was to make funding available to marginalized groups. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
” The employee in Tuesday’s case, Gerald Groff, is asking the justices to overturn their 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
But, as the Supreme Court explained in its Moody v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
For many decades, there have been moderate Republicans on the Court—John M. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
For many decades, there have been moderate Republicans on the Court—John M. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
For instance, they describe a a short but telling November 2017 exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Scott Gant (counsel for the Department of the Interior) in the case of Patchak v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
It isn’t. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
There may be some mileage in pursuing John Stuart Mill’s ‘tyranny of the majority’ argument: that unpopular speech ought to be protected to ensure minority voices are heard. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
In that moment, I wasn’t looking to the past. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
