Search for: "Kat"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 6,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
Dreaming of enhancedprotection for Kat healthHowever, he used the case study of ZYTIGA and how market authorisations were granted nearly 20 years after the initial patents to illustrate that data exclusivity can be a more effective incentive than patent protection. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
This Kat is opining on IP lawIt's been a busy week in the IP blogosphere. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am
The anti-suit injunction would thus have effectively amounted to a deprivation of IPCom's property [par. 58].To this Kat, the reasoning of the appeal court holds more appeal (no pun intended). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 5:15 am
This decision was heavily criticized – see an interesting analysis by Enrico Bonadio here – but this Kat wonders what, exactly, is wrong with it. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 12:29 am
Kat friend Prof. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
For Kat readers who may not yet be aware and are still planning to attend the MARQUES Spring meeting, scheduled to begin this Wednesday in Frankfurt, please take note as follows: It is with much regret that we are cancelling the 2020 Spring meeting in Frankfurt due to the health risks associated with the coronavirus (COVID 19. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:59 am
This Kat likes to smell the springtime flowersWelcome to March, and to this latest edition of Monday Miscellany! [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 12:56 pm
Although the court did not address future or alternative technologies, this Kat is confident that it will not arise very often. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:37 am
Having regard to the instant case, this Kat would suggest that the Court of Justice will find that shapes and appearance fall within the scope of Art. 13(1). [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:25 am
This Kat is excited to introduce the latest instalment in the IP Education Series [previous episodes: Intro, #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:16 am
[This Kat is currently preparing a post on the revised Swiss Copyright Act, so stay tuned.] [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:03 am
That said, in the 2019 Abraxis case ( C-443/17, EU:C:2019:238), the CJEU limited the scope of the Neurim exception to a minimum (see this Kat’s post on the Abraxis case). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
This is particularly the case in the current Chinese trade mark system, which, from this Kat’s point of view, has a prominent flaw: the cost of filing malicious opposition is too low. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:56 pm
This Kat has much to think aboutTo this Kat's surprise, it's already nearly the end of February - but regardless of your relationship to the passage of time, it's never too late to catch up on the IPKat's posts from the past week.CopyrightGuestKat Thomas Key identified some potential grounds which the US Supreme Court may consider its forthcoming decision in the pirating case of Allen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 10:01 pm
For instance, if my clients have an employee privacy issue or security breach, I ask Kwabena Appenteng to help; for sensitive wage/hours issues, I ping John Ybarra, Andrew Voss or Jennifer Schilling; for bet-the-company restrictive covenant work, I trust Jim Witz and Darren Mungerson; for benefits issues, I rely on Finn Pressly, who clients adore for his plain English explanation of benefits issues; for service animal accommodation questions, it’s Peter Petesch to the rescue; for tough drug… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:38 am
Kat friend Doug Calhoun brings us a report of a recent judgment from New Zealand involving a plant variety right. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:39 am
Former Guest Kat Mathilde Pavis offers readers a review of the book by Daniela Simone, "Copyright and Collective Authorship: Locating the Authors of Collaborative Works". [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
Of all the matters before the Supreme Court this term, this Kat is anxiously awaiting an opinion in one pirating case: Allen v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
. | Remembering this Kat's cat (and what's in a feline name?) [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:03 am
In particular, the changes to the minutes seem to be in order to support (albeit weakly in this Kat's view) an argument that the rights of the patentee to be heard on the issue of the referral were violated, and that the patentee had raised this issue with the Board of Appeal. [read post]
