Search for: "Limited Properties, Inc." Results 1101 - 1120 of 8,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down judgment in the controversial case of Google Inc v Equustek Solutions  (2017 SCC 34) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
The Intellectual Property Clause of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The discovery of a new property or use of a previously known composition, even when that property and use are unobvious from the prior art, can not impart patentability to the known composition. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
Niantic, Inc., filed July 29, 2016 in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:13 am by Andrew M. Taylor
 A separate judgment was entered the same day declaring the Civil Justice Reform Act’s limitation on punitive damages unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 9:55 pm
AUTO - RENTAL VEHICLE - UNAUTHORIZED DRIVER - VEHICLE & TRAFFIC LAW § 370 - ANTISUBROGATION RULEELRAC, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent a Car v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am by Thomas P. Gulick
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 10:18 pm
A sleeper case that provides a powerfulclaim-limiting rule is Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:42 pm by WIMS
(Solvent) sued two adjoining property owners, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 Differences surfaced over additional cultural property questions, including: Should FinCen’s regulations be broad or narrow? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:19 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
Woody Woo, Inc. ruling that the FLSA does not impose any restrictions on the kinds of employees who may participate in a valid tip pool where the employer does not claim the “tip credit. [read post]