Search for: "MATTER OF H D" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They worry about whether it will lead to litigation, even when they’re very certain they’d prevail. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
A decade ago, two esteemed scholars of judicial behavior, Lee Epstein and Andrew D. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:33 am by Michael Busby
IN   THE MATTER OF § IN   THE DISTRICT COURT THE   MARRIAGE OF §     §     §     § ____________   JUDICIAL DISTRICT   §     §     §     § § HARRIS   COUNTY, TEXAS  … [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Gene Takagi
It does not matter if the soliciting charity is proposing to raise funds for which it is considering making the other charity its grantee. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:50 am by Lev Sugarman
Speakers include paper authors Vann H. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:05 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Nancy Cruzan and the Withhold Versus Withdraw DilemmaWilliam H. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am by Diane Tweedlie
With a letter of 28 January 2015 the appellants furnished a copy of those notes.On 21 May 2015 the examining division decided to grant European patent number 2192783.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
  (h) One of such offenses is enterprise corruption in violation of section 460.20 of the penal law, racketeering in violation of federal law or any comparable offense pursuant to the law of another state and a separate or subsequent prosecution is not [read post]