Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
Ruth V. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
In order to obtain a patent in the United States it is necessary to file a US patent application. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
No, under Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:52 pm
A couple of our wise readers noted below that the out-of-date MCM appears to have led the Coast Guard Court to err in its published decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
United States, a case regarding damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:26 am
United States, 140 Fed. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:02 am
First, the patents were re-examined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) over newly found prior art, but Kelora overcame the new rejections by amending the claims to perform the parametric search through a resubmission to a server. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
Microsoft Corp., 783 F.Supp.2d 1097 (N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
TCL and Philips v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to hold a special remedies hearing. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
As recognized by the Supreme Court, it "is fundamental that claims are to be construed in light of the specifications and both are to be read with a view to ascertaining the invention," United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
"This is now a policy question, and Oracle's response was that Microsoft and Apple (by coincidence, Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
United States Applications for summary judgment have been filed in “Dr. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
It was evident in this week’s hearing that the United States national security apparatus remains heavily focused upon counterterrorism. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
The Californian Attorney General has allegedly misled the court by stating that Pratibha (defendant) “has not asserted any valid defence as to its use of pirated Microsoft programs. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]GlobalIBM's IP portfolio value extraction patent (IAM), (PLI), Facebook - Microsoft has beaten Google to a chunk of the popular social-networking site, agreeing to pay $240m for a 1.6 percent stake (ZDNet), Global IP Strategy - can you keep up? [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
V. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law) United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Microsoft (B.C.C.A., April 15, 2011) (34282) Oct. 31, 13 The S.C.C. held: Indirect purchasers have a cause of action against the overcharging party. [read post]
