Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
And that was the end of it for Miller. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Miller, 10-851, and McEwen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS The United States sued the state of California and California officials over California’s immigration enforcement policies. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1424 (3d Cir. 1991) (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Kamran Bajwa and Samuel Miller offer the first in-depth engagement with Muslim amici before the US Supreme Court, adding both to the literature on religious amici and on the politics of Islam in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 6:24 pm
The "privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States," on the other hand, was an accepted term of art which referred to those rights conferred upon United States citizens by the Constitution itself. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Gurung v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
" United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:50 am
Miller, supra (applying California v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Carlisle: The United States Supreme Court Says that Non-Signatories Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements Whenever State Law Would Permit them to Enforce Contracts Generally, Philip J. [read post]
