Search for: "Myers v. Myers" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Pickering’s balancing test applies only when the employee speaks “as a citizen upon matters of public concern” rather than “as an employee upon matters only of personal interest” [Connick v Myers, 461 US 138].5. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
"In Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, the US Supreme Court indicated that federal courts usually will not consider retaliation allegations based on an employee's claim of free speech where "only matters of a personal interest" to the employee, in contrast to "matters of public concern," are involved. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Earlier this year, the Federal Court of Appeal, in Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
We reported to you last August on Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Myers denied the motion for a stay of the July 6, 2020 order, applying the 3-part RJR Macdonald test. [read post]