Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) I have been considering the issue of of labor cooperatives as a central element of the reform (though quite limited and preliminary) of the Cuban economic system. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:09 pm by Rob McKinney
What about people that may not have the money to pay for an independent blood sample? [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The court in the case of People v Reed, held that a breath sample shall be collected within two hours of the time of arrest or within two hours of a positive breath alcohol screening test. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
I’ll give you a sample from the first few pages below, but trying to pick just a portion is not an easy thing, as one segment after another vies for inclusion. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
This system, combining inmate choice with strict government neutrality as between secular and religious providers, is consistent with the Establishment Clause for the same reasons that school choice plans are constitutional, as explained in Zelman v. [read post]
Here’s just a sampling of the campaigns and events happening today: In Argentina, the Asociación por los Derechos Civiles and Vía Libre Foundation is suing the Argentinian Congressional surveillance oversight commission for withholding basic information on surveillance practices in the country. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm by Larry
Mainly because I just read Links Snacks, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Mitch Stoltz and Parker Higgins
Acuff-Rose Music ("Whether ... parody is in good taste or bad does not and should not matter to fair use") and Yankee Publishing Inc. v. [read post]