Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
  Tellingly, Judge Rothstein denied, in large part, the defendants’ Rule 702 challenges. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:20 am by Broc Romanek
(Note to Delaware companies: There is no language in this executive order limiting it to service providers incorporated in New York -- so this is an issue for any and all companies who provide services to New York State). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Class actions were filed in a Texas state court, a Delaware chancery court, and a federal district court in Texas. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, under Delaware law, they cannot claim mandatory indemnification if their defense is not successful. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
On March 27, 2009, Cray used an IP address controlled by Comcast Communications, 67.162.248.119, to access the Website from Dover, Delaware. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Edward M. McNally
McNally This article was originally published in the Delaware Business Court Insider | February 8, 2012 Litigation in multiple courts over the same basic claim continues to be a serious problem for corporate defendants. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 6:24 pm by Monté T. Squire
In analyzing the relevant private and public interest factors identified by the Third Circuit, the Court concluded, among other things, that because a corporate entity’s state of incorporation was part of its “home turf,” plaintiff’s choice of Delaware as a litigation forum in this action was entitled to “paramount consideration. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm by Mike Laszlo
”  - Charles Elson, a teacher of corporate governance at the University of Delaware, as quoted in the Loten article. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Stephen Jenei
After a name change, that entity became the Defendant Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:34 am by Peter B. Ladig
Ladig This article was originally published in the Delaware Business Court Insider | January 25, 2012 Defendants in class and derivative litigation often view the plaintiffs in those cases, especially the repeat players whose names are familiar to devoted readers of Court of Chancery opinions, as minor investors with little directly at stake in the litigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
The reported story is “Trustee in jackpot case is defendant in Delaware lawsuit” published on January 19, 2011 by Daniel P. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:50 pm by Robert Vrana
Considering the Third Circuit’s private and public interests framework for analyzing motions to transfer, Judge Andrews stated: “[Plaintiff’s forum preference] supports the plaintiffs’ position that the case should not be transferred. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:18 am by Francis Pileggi
District Court for the District of Delaware alleging violations of state and federal securities laws and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Ed Wallis
During the hearing held in Los Angeles, defendant Takeda stated to the court that it will move to transfer all pending California filed cases to the newly formed federal MDL (multi-district litigation) in the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]