Search for: "State v. Dream" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 2:03 am
NEWS: Home Affairs Ministry to implement new sentencing optionsChannel News Asia... 2010 2153 hrs SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) wants to introduce new sentencing options this year by amending the Criminal Procedure Code. ...See all stories on this topic   Bill published to set up DNA database to fight crimeIrish TimesThe Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 (Amendment) Bill will provide for statutory rules governing the recall of persons released by the Criminal Law (Mental… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 12:19 am by Aaron Moss
Walken play out in in a courtroom will, unfortunately, likely remain a pipe dream. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:40 pm
Party Constitution CPPCC Constitution State Constitution 1945 Amendment VI 1949 Common Program 1954 Amendment I Constitution Promulgated 1956 Amendment VII 1969 Amendment VIII 1973 Amendment IX 1975 Amendment I 1977 Amendment X 1978 Amendment II Amendment II 1982 Amendment XI Amendment III Amendment III 1987 Amendment XII 1988 Amendment IV 1992 Amendment XIII 1993 Amendment V 1994 Amendment IV 1997 Amendment… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
Thomas offers an all-out attack on the ideal of an integrated society that the advocates who pushed for Brown dreamed of. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:32 am
Judicial ruling strengthening protection of integrity of works The case in question: Muye Zhang v China Film Co. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am by Arkady Bukh
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
Increasingly, the normative foundations of the international legal order are shifting away from the traditional bedrock principles of State sovereignty and State security to new foundations based on human rights and human security. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
  The Supreme Court recognized this connection in General Electric v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]