Search for: "State v. Hodges" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Helping Family Voices address these challenges are partners at the state Title V/CSHCN agency, the Children's Hospital, Agenda for Children, MCH, the UAP, and the Academy of Pediatrics. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:09 am
See Orona-Rangal, Hodges, and Murray. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:54 am by PaulKostro
’” In re Jobes, 108 N.J. 394, 407-08 (1987) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am by SHG
’s foundational premise of heterosexual parenting and nonrecognition of same-sex couples is unsustainable, particularly in light of the enactment of same-sex marriage in New York State, and the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v Hodges (576 US __, 135 S Ct 2584 [2015]), which noted that the right to marry provides benefits not only for same-sex couples, but also the children being raised by those couples. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. prophetically stated in his dissent from the infamous 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
The Office emphasized that this change is needed in light of the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]