Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 7,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Which brings us to Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership and Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
Holder, Hui v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
In Summerhill Village Homeowners Association v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In 2006, the Delhi High Court in the case of the Scotch Whisky Association v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
It now appears as though the much-anticipated case al-Marri v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
These three paragraphs state cumulative conditions. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm
United States, Doe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
"After rejecting the State's arguments, Judge Debevoise suggested that the State reconcile the Truth in Music Act with the Lanham Act by interpreting subsection (e) of the former to permit unregistered trademark holders to perform under their group names without any additional requirements. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:43 pm
Fund 3, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:45 am
Co-author Brittany Blakey The takeaway from Hahn v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Grosshart v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 2016 WL 5661526 (W.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
I.e. member states could delay the effectiveness of this provision to the year 2525 if they so desire. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This reasoning walks a fine line without providing any certainty for trade mark holders and future applicants as to where the protection of a word or concept begins and where it ends. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted cert. in Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Holder urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
The key question was whether the "lawfully made under this title" language of the first sale section refers to items that were physically made in the United States or whether it encompasses copies that were licensed by a United States copyright holder but manufactured abroad. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
In Flynn v. [read post]
