Search for: "State v. McDonald" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 9:22 am by Kiera Flynn
“The Future of Gun Control in the United States After the Heller and McDonald Cases, with a Canadian Perspective on Gun Control Issues,” Saturday, August 6, 2011, 2:00 to 3:30 p.m., Room 713A, 700 Level, Metro Toronto Convention Center, South Building. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:25 am by Tessa Shepperson
Previous Court of Appeal decisions (ie Fernandez v McDonald in 2003) have found that if the date on the notice is even one day wrong, the landlord will fail in his claim for possession. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:25 pm by Alex Vitrak
Aggressive tactics are used to police minor, nonviolent crimes every day, in every state. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  ** Citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Appellate Division's decision held the arbitrator was free to consider "parol evidence" concerning a past practice given the ambiguity the arbitrator found in Article 45, §E of the CBA.Click here to access the Appellate Division's ruling. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:13 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The court also found that even after the federal government rescinded its agreement with the Sheriff's office authorizing officers to enforce certain provisions of immigration law, and after the Supreme Court made clear in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  ** Citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Appellate Division's decision held the arbitrator was free to consider "parol evidence" concerning a past practice given the ambiguity the arbitrator found in Article 45, §E of the CBA.Click here to access the Appellate Division's ruling. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” In Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald urge the court to grant the pending cert petition in Christie v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Court adopted this strategy in U.S. v. [read post]