Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 29,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 3:27 am
In Ponticelli UK Ltd v Gallagher, the Inner House of the Court of Session held that employee share incentive plans, even if explicitly stated to be non-contractual (and not referred to in the employment contract) arise “in connection with” the employee’s employment. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 am
Case cite: The Ray Charles Foundation v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:30 am
The parenting plan provided that Father is designated the primary residential parent for purposes of federal and state statutes. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:05 pm
Lawmakers in Montana are planning to introduce an initiative to amend the state constitution to protect digital privacy. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
[#Air, #CA3] U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
In a victory for health insurance policy holders over health insurers/health care service plans, in Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc, v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:50 am
Case Study: Zide v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
By The United States Supreme Court ruled on March 1, 2016 in Gobeille v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
By Rich McHugh The United States Supreme Court ruled on March 1, 2016 in Gobeille v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
On May 15, 2006, the United States Supreme Court decided the Sereboff v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
Here is what the ripeness requirements of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
The North Carolina plaintiffs claimed that the State’s districting plan discriminated against Democrats, while the Maryland plaintiffs claimed that their State’s plan discriminated against Republicans. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
Instead, the SEC accepted OCC’s findings with minimal evidence of the basis for the company’s own determinations, the court found (Susquehanna International Group, LLP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
” In Delligatti v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
In Missouri Insurance Coalition v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:32 am
Via The Volokh Conspiracy, I learned of an interesting Fourth Amendment decision by a federal court in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:03 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain,... [read post]
