Search for: "State v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 258,357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Once again surprising the country by acting ten days before its own self-appointed deadline, a federal district judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling today in the Ryan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
  (Applause.)Let me ask you: Are you ready to elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz president and vice president of the United States? [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 1:25 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In a 2-1 decision reversing the lower court, the Seventh Circuit last week joined the Third, Sixth, and Eighth circuits in holding that the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
But state courts are entitled to read their state constitutions as more speech-protective than the federal Constitution. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm
Today's criminal law advance release slip opinion: State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:24 pm by <a href=''>Greenberg Traurig, LLP</a>
Discussion Topics:   Speech in the workplace v. speech outside the workplace: Can it be restricted and what is “the workplace”? [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
United States: From David Hasen (Florida; Google Scholar): I bring you a brief update on our upcoming symposium on Moore v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:33 am by Salvatore Gangemi of Murtha Cullina LLP
This decision follows the lead of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, which issued a preliminary injunction preventing the rule from taking effect, but only regarding the plaintiff in the case of Ryan LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 628-29 (1935)(limiting the holding in Myers v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This right covers both interstate (state to state) and intrastate (neighborhood to neighborhood or city to city) travel. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]