Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 49,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 12:04 pm
But it's not the law. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm
(I say all this, by the way, having no connection whatsoever to the situation out there other than knowing a few students who are Riverside ADAs, previously working with someone (Hal Hopp) who's now a Riverside judge, and the fact that the Riverside DA is a USD Law graduate from way back. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm
There are few opinions that you'll have occasion to employ in your everyday life, but this is one of them.I always assumed it was the law that you have to use your turn signal whenever you're turning. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
On the other hand, unless you're going to call any crime collectively committed by gang members as "for the benefit of" the gang" -- so they can giggle and taunt others about it, and feel collectively more brazen about their violations of the law -- it seems a pretty big stretch to say that was transpired here was designed to benefit the gang.So both the majority and the dissent have a point. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 1:52 pm
Not because it makes a difference in the law, or (perhaps) the result. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Still, the Times quotes Loyola Law Professor Laurie Levenson as saying lack of victim cooperation might not matter in the "Post-OJ world," especially when the prosecution has a 911 tape on which Mueller... [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:58 pm
Crabtree's the only lawyer I've ever seen who, even though he's not eligible to practice law, has dutifully kept the State Bar apprised of his current address; namely, his address in prison. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:19 pm
Bryant appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
Nevertheless, it isn’t – unfortunately – a new Cotton Field.Filed under: Gender Issues, International Human Rights Law, IntLawGrrls, Latin America and the Caribbean, Public International Law, Women's Rights Law [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:29 pm
Here are some of the latest materials related to Indian Law. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:17 pm
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 1/6/17. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Opti v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
I told you he meant the people outside. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm
Woolums v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
Now, all those 213 people don't have an election to run in, and their terms automatically expire. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
In such a brave new world, ‘strictly doctrinal’ law faculty teaching ‘real law’—I don’t know what these terms mean, but people seem to believe they exist—may be the ones who suffer under the new university-driven, liberal arts regime. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
(Tribal Lending; Arbitration; Choice-of-Law Provision) Garfield County, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
