Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 6,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 10:05 am
" Based on the United States Supreme Court decision in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
The opinion is the latest in a string of Doyle violations found by the Third Circuit (United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
On July 23, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an important decision in Eyeblaster, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:01 am
Thomas Hardiman, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Hardiman serves on the same court as Maryanne Barry Trump, which is based in Philadelphia. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:58 pm
The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently dealt with some of these new considerations in One Beacon Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) to deny registration of “EVERYBODY VS RACISM” because the “public is unlikely to associate the mark . . . as a source-identifier” of GO & Associates, LLC’s (“GO”) goods and services. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) to deny registration of “EVERYBODY VS RACISM” because the “public is unlikely to associate the mark . . . as a source-identifier” of GO & Associates, LLC’s (“GO”) goods and services. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
On July 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a district court’s order enjoining a senior executive from Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc., from working for one of Bimbo’s competitors, Hostess, until after the district court resolved the merits of Bimbo’s misappropriation of trade secrets claim against the executive. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
The majority of circuits that had addressed the issue followed the Third Circuit’s opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
Furthermore, the United States Supreme Court has noted that courts must consider the relationship of the litigant to the person whose rights are being asserted, the ability of the person to advance his own rights, and the impact of the litigation on third-party interests. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the above-captioned case. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:36 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco, said the electrically disabling device constituted excessive force when used against an unarmed man who did not pose a threat, and it refused to allow a police officer immunity for its use. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
On March 28, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed the grant of class certification in In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation, Nos. 07-2257, 07-2258, 07-2259, 2008 WL (1st Cir. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:02 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 10:22 am
For employment-related civil rights claims or violations of Federal laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Fair Labor Standards Act, employees can file suit in the Federal courts beginning with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey which sits in Camden, Trenton and Newark, with appeals heard by the United Staes Third Circuit… [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 12:38 pm
Nov. 9, 2006) (available here): "We address in this case further aspects of the sentencing process for our Circuit in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
The full Fourth Circuit upheld the district court’s preliminary injunction of the third travel ban by a vote of nine to four. [read post]
