Search for: "United States v. Craft" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The United States Treasury Department has cited ransom amounts that, taken together, put the total at around $165 million over the same period. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Educators and legislators . . . have endeavored to craft policies designed to counter the adverse impact of bullying on children. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
The warrant, issued by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and dated November 17, 2003, authorized the seizure from Ganias's offices of:All books, records, documents, materials, computer hardware and software and computer associated data relating to the business, financial and accounting operations of [IPM] and American Boiler. . . .The warrant was executed two days later. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
Here’s the best line in the Riley opinion: The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is “materially indistinguishable” from searches of these sorts of physical items… . [read post]