Search for: "Carter v. May"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Nov. 21, 2011) (holding that using taser three times on man who, in "drunken stupor," was physically removed from city bus, and engaged in verbal and physical confrontation with officer, may have been excessive use of force, but that law regarding taser use was not clearly established as of November 2009); Carter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
Carter, 721 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Carter v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Dallas County Tex., 320 Fed.Appx. 262, 263 (5th Cir.2009) (striking pleadings because they “contain abusive and disrespectful language”); Carter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
E.g., Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
Any serious effect of this nature may result in a breach of Article 8 rights if it prevents the person concerned from enjoying the amenities of their home (Moreno Gomez v Spain [2005] 41 EHRR 40 There is also a prison nearby, and the letter asserts that the prison staff cannot avoid working close to the proposed development unless they resign from the jobs. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
May be distinctive. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:26 pm
See Parks v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:59 pm
That section states that: A claim which is the same as, or for the same or substantially the same subject matter as, a claim of an issued patent may not be made in any application unless such a claim is made prior to one year from the date on which the patent was granted. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
Similarly, in Carter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Tenn. 1995), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d 641 (6th Cir. 1998) (concluding that an individual supervisor working for an employer may not be liable as an employer under the FMLA); Carter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
") In Carter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:42 am
Here, in Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP ;2012 NY Slip Op 30134(U) ;January 12, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 100857/11 ;Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
McBride, Hammer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:21 am
“fleeting expletives”); accordingly, the Court may decide to treat these categories differently with separate rulings. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Carter v. [read post]
