Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm by Jennifer S. Bard
That is because doing so crosses a line that leads to anarchy and chaos. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:07 am by Minick Law
Professor Broyles worked for a decade as an Assistant United States Attorney in the WDNC initially specializing in organized crime and drugs. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support - the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
That both the United States and Israel are wrestling with these fundamental questions makes this an opportune time to revisit them. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”  The report suggests these concerns may derive from three different qualities of sustainable business information and reporting: control v. influence; quantitative v. qualitative; and historical v. forward-looking. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by News Desk
On July 13, 2022, their operator mixing and cooking RTE (redacted) ingredients in an industrial mixer stated that the hummus is typically mixed and cooked for (redacted), but the temperature of the mixture is not checked or recorded, and the equipment does not have a built-in thermometer. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Igor Nikolic
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Lee Kovarsky
A state’s ability to attach consequences to concealment of the conviction isn’t barred just because the state can’t criminalize the predicate itself. [read post]