Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
Case in point: Hartman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:16 pm
On October 27 and 28, respectively, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in the seminal case of Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Holly holds a B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
In Vance v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:08 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
Deane v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm
[iv] “Every other U.S. industry that has been deregulated, from trucking to telephones, has lowered prices for consumers without sacrificing quality,”[v] they further proclaimed. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
The confirmation of an arbitral award against a state and allegations of ambiguity characterize the case of Duke Energy International Peru Investments No.1 Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Circuit panel in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
Duke Energy Corp., 549 U.S. 561 (2007), and Mayo Found. for Med. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:20 pm
I will be speaking on due process and Sackett v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:54 pm
Enter Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
The opinion closely analyzes Dukes. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]