Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 10:33 pm
An interpretation whereupon the requirements of the jurisdiction can be fulfilled after pendancy and which orientates to the best interests of the child remains for an amendment of the regulation. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
That requires assessing the government’s interest in a search, weighing how much the search advanced those interests, and then comparing that to the degree of privacy invasion. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a Blake Medical Center; FRANCISCO ESPARZA, M.D.; DAVID DIVITA, M.D.; and PINNACLE MEDICAL GROUP, P.A., Appellees. 2nd District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Deficiency -- Action at law by mortgagee to recover damages for breach of note after mortgagee had included prayer for deficiency judgment in foreclosure complaint and trial court [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:01 am
The court held that the payments did not satisfy section 71(b)(1)(D), which requires that the payor have no obligation to make the payments after the death of the payee. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
’ § 784 .046(1)(b). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
B. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
B. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Green, D. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:31 am
As a parent, I cannot imagine anything worse than the sudden death of a child who has had you wrapped around her finger from the first time you held her in your arms. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
It’s nearly 10:00 a.m. one Friday in late February, and I’m getting antsy. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
The Applicable Law B. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Mrs Wyatt brought a child from a previous relationship into the marriage and in 1983 the parties had a child together. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:51 am
’ § 784 .046(1)(b). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
As a general matter, it is of course, in a child's best interest to have a loving relationship with both parents. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Souter avoids this in Campbell; remains holistic, w/ glaring exception being factor two, the neglected middle child of fair use doctrine. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
After considering these principles and the thirteen factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5)(d) in determining the appropriate equitable distribution of the marital property of the parties (see Holterman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
Majauskas, 61 NY2d 481, 489-490; Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][d][6]). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
