Search for: "In Re Graham" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
(More disclosure: During the relevant period, I worked at a subsidiary of Gen Re.) [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
And so they’re gonna have a natural disadvantage, and Trump’s going to take advantage of it. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
We’ll see what the court says,” Graham told CNN yesterday. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
In it Christina Duffy Ponsa writes "the book makes you feel like you’re looking at history through a 360-degree lens. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
Last week, in Bailey and Williams v Graham and Levi Roots [2012] EWCA Civ 1469 (16 November 2012), the Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the claims to adduce additional evidence and dismissed the appeal [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 3:45 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham  [R-SC] certainly is sensitive to the high ranking of the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:06 am
This is the task that Graham Greenleaf and David Lindsay have set for themselves in their book, Public rights – Copyright’s Public Domains.Instead of describing where copyright ends, Greenleaf and Lindsay describe where public domains begin. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:53 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Also, I wouldn’t rule out the revival of the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, the even-more-evil twin of EARN IT, born from the same father (Senator Lindsey Graham [R-SC], who’s up for re-election). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:29 am by Ben
The case was brought by Los Angeles-based photographer Donald Graham against Prince, the Gagosian Gallery and Larry Gagosian, alleging that the defendants infringed the federally registered copyright in his photo, Rastafarian Smoking a Joint. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:54 am by Joe Mullin
Lindsey Graham (R-SC) have re-introduced the EARN IT Act, an incredibly unpopular bill from 2020 that was dropped in the face of overwhelming opposition. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:20 pm by KC Johnson
You can read a comprehensive analysis of the petition at the Liestoppers forum.The petition—irrespective of its legal merits—is a longshot: assuming that each of the three-judge panel votes against Ekstrand, eight of the circuit’s remaining judges would then need to vote for a re-hearing. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:25 am by Joe Mullin
”   Using crimes against children as an excuse to blow a hole in critical legal protections for online speech, Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) co-sponsored this law. [read post]